tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8677405.post113261490416501855..comments2008-07-26T18:35:41.142ZD. Wheathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03846478957198693337noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8677405.post-1148036288637952592006-05-19T10:58:00.000Z2006-05-19T10:58:00.000ZI started my own HIV/AIDS live chat support network (no AIDS org near me) on <A HREF="http://www.13km.com" REL="nofollow"> http://www.13km.com </A> so I could meet more HIV positive or affected friends online, please stop in, we are not alone ;)HIV+DaveyBoyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16980811241821205030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8677405.post-1134114059958552712005-12-09T07:40:00.000Z2005-12-09T07:40:00.000ZThe figures in the graph are UNAIDS estimates, not reported diagnoses. They use many sources and means of estimation. So no, the number isn't rising due to better diagnosing, but just because the number of new infections exceeds the number of deaths of AIDS patients every year.D. Wheathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03846478957198693337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8677405.post-1134090785113462522005-12-09T01:13:00.000Z2005-12-09T01:13:00.000ZDo you suppose the increasing numbers of people with aids shown in the graph in this post is representative of increased incedence or just increased diagnosis? Just curious.Betsynoreply@blogger.com